Posted by: simonsteachingblog | September 16, 2009

The Late and the Current

Richard Mosse’s recent photographs of palaces belonging to the former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and members of his family now occupied by US military forces, present what appears to be a new development in the genre of photographic practice described by David Campany as ‘late photography’ (David Campany, ‘Safety in Numbness: Some remarks on problems of “Late Photography’’’, in David Green, ed., Where is the Photograph?, Brighton: Photoforum and Photoworks, 2003).

The typical late photograph pictures damaged buildings, or other kinds of detritus that attest to something having happened in a particular location before the photograph was taken. Their lateness involves the lateness of the arrival of the photographer on the scene. As he observes, these photographs are ‘not so much the trace of an event as the trace of the trace of an event.’ Such events are usually acts of violence of different kinds, from the destruction of the World Trade Centre to the burning of documents.

Vilém Flusser has observed that the still camera allows us ‘to “take” something from the stream of history’ (Vilém Flusser, ‘Image and History’, European Photography, 27:79/80, 206, p. 6), yet the sites pictured in late photography already seem removed from the continuum of history in terms of their stillness and quiet. Even before the taking of the photograph these sites seem to be of the past, defined as they are by the remnants of something that happened in that location; a sense of being of the past that is reinforced by the photographic act itself.  The capacity of photography to attest to something having been there adds another layer of distance between the viewer and the original event.

U.S. Military Telephone Kiosks in Saddam's Birthday Palace, Tikrit, Iraq, 2009

U.S. Military Telephone Kiosks in Saddam's Birthday Palace, Tikrit, Iraq, 2009

Although some of the photographs in Mosses’ series ‘Breach’ are of palaces that have been damaged by US bombardment (for example the images of Saddam’s Palace in Jebel Makhoul), many break with the standard late photographic representation of the aftermath site by showing us the former residences of the family Saddam in conjunction with the structures that US forces have built and continue to use within the palaces. In this way the photographs are both ‘late’ in that they represent locations that were sites of a now defunct order and current in that they are now sites of the installation of a new power structure in Iraq. The photographs show the rooms of Saddam’s Birthday Palace in Tikrit, for example, filled with makeshift dormitories and offices for US forces, or gym equipment, sandbags, and a barbecue in the Al-Faw Palace (now renamed ‘Camp Victory’) in Baghdad. In this way the photographs are more complex in pictorial terms than standard late photography, presenting an explicit dialogue between past and present through actually depicted material forms. Such a dialogue between past and present is only implicit in most other examples of the genre.

What might this dialogue between past and present in these photographs tell us? Is it possible, for example, to read the photographs in terms of Simon Norfolk’s suggestion that images of aftermath sites, with their remnants and ruins, bring the ‘vanity of Empire’ into visibility (Daylight Magazine, number 4, 2006)? Can we suggest that both the grandiose palaces of a fallen regime and the makeshift structures that have been constructed in the palaces by the successor to Saddam’s rule point to the folly and temporary nature of even the most seemingly secure military and political power? Is the fall of Saddam in the past something that is suggestive of the future of the US in Iraq that is already being played out in the present?

There is an interesting interview with Richard Mosse on his photographs of Saddam’s palaces at BLDG BLOG that is worth looking at.


  1. While I concur with your reading of the pictures as the vanitas of Empire , I also see another reading. Late photography has also been compared to scene of crime /forensic photography. In most late photographs there are gaps where we project our own images of the crimes that happened there.
    But these images of the criminal war in Iraq, Mosse gives us have clear documentary evidence of a second crime still ongoing.
    The image of the US soldiers at Saddam’s swimming pool reminded me of Argentine artist Leon Ferrari’s sculpture depicting US global domination (I could not find a still image of this, but you can see it on a You Tube video ‘Leon Ferrari homenaje de Belleartes ‘ if you pause it at 4’44’).

  2. The openness of late photography allows for a wide range of readings. Different readings can also exist concurrently for the same viewer.

    I would agree that Mosse’s photographs can be equally read as ‘vanitas of Empire’ and as crime scenes. Indeed, I would suggest that the folly of US imperial military ambition and the criminality of the war in Iraq are aspects of the same condition.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: